Would You Recruit This Transfer At The 1,Let Tarrant Play The 2? (2024)

Post: #1

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketba...seton-hall

Post: #2

Post: #3

Post: #4

Post: #5

(04-29-2015 04:25 AM)Rufus T. Firefly Wrote: http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketba...seton-hall

no, we have enough point guards now...we need a big

Post: #6

(04-29-2015 08:27 AM)Oman Wrote:

(04-29-2015 04:25 AM)Rufus T. Firefly Wrote: http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketba...seton-hall

no, we have enough point guards now...we need a big

This.

Post: #7

Post: #8

(04-29-2015 09:08 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote: We need to develop our young guys particularly Markel Crawford

Or, prepare for more transfers in a few years which I would hate to see happen to Crawford or Martin.

(This post was last modified: 04-29-2015 09:26 AM by CoachJammer.)

Post: #9

Can ANYONE logically put forth a reason why Tarrant would play the PG?

The best I can tell is that Gary Parrish said the kid had good handles. Good handles does not mean one should play the point.

Last year he basically had a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio while taking the most shots on the team--a vast majority of his shots (58%) were from beyond three, yet he only shot 29.9% from behind the arc. Plus, he consistently had below average defensive ratings and a tendency to get into foul trouble (averaged 3.5 fouls per game in SEC play).

Post: #10

(04-29-2015 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Can ANYONE logically put forth a reason why Tarrant would play the PG?

The best I can tell is that Gary Parrish said the kid had good handles. Good handles does not mean one should play the point.

Last year he basically had a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio while taking the most shots on the team--a vast majority of his shots (58%) were from beyond three, yet he only shot 29.9% from behind the arc. Plus, he consistently had below average defensive ratings and a tendency to get into foul trouble (averaged 3.5 fouls per game in SEC play).

...B/c your other options are a PG who may not even care about basketball or two 3-star freshmen

Post: #11

(04-29-2015 09:56 AM)HometownTiger Wrote:

(04-29-2015 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Can ANYONE logically put forth a reason why Tarrant would play the PG?

The best I can tell is that Gary Parrish said the kid had good handles. Good handles does not mean one should play the point.

Last year he basically had a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio while taking the most shots on the team--a vast majority of his shots (58%) were from beyond three, yet he only shot 29.9% from behind the arc. Plus, he consistently had below average defensive ratings and a tendency to get into foul trouble (averaged 3.5 fouls per game in SEC play).

...B/c your other options are a PG who may not even care about basketball or two 3-star freshmen

We have 4*'s in Pookie and Magee who have a full year of experience under their belts. Not a lot of pressure on their shoulders, especially with the loaded frontcourt.

Nevermind.

Post: #12

(04-29-2015 09:56 AM)HometownTiger Wrote:

(04-29-2015 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Can ANYONE logically put forth a reason why Tarrant would play the PG?

The best I can tell is that Gary Parrish said the kid had good handles. Good handles does not mean one should play the point.

Last year he basically had a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio while taking the most shots on the team--a vast majority of his shots (58%) were from beyond three, yet he only shot 29.9% from behind the arc. Plus, he consistently had below average defensive ratings and a tendency to get into foul trouble (averaged 3.5 fouls per game in SEC play).

...B/c your other options are a PG who may not even care about basketball or two 3-star freshmen

Which brings us to the original topic. With all the question marks surrounding Johnson at the PG spot, in my mind, I was certain that CJP's main focus was going to be on getting a PG that can be productive in his system. I would hope that in Martin or Tarrant, he's found that guy either individually or by committee, and won't have to use another scholarship on a PG.

Post: #13

(04-29-2015 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote:

(04-29-2015 09:56 AM)HometownTiger Wrote:

(04-29-2015 09:34 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Can ANYONE logically put forth a reason why Tarrant would play the PG?

The best I can tell is that Gary Parrish said the kid had good handles. Good handles does not mean one should play the point.

Last year he basically had a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio while taking the most shots on the team--a vast majority of his shots (58%) were from beyond three, yet he only shot 29.9% from behind the arc. Plus, he consistently had below average defensive ratings and a tendency to get into foul trouble (averaged 3.5 fouls per game in SEC play).

...B/c your other options are a PG who may not even care about basketball or two 3-star freshmen

We have 4*'s in Pookie and Magee who have a full year of experience under their belts. Not a lot of pressure on their shoulders, especially with the loaded frontcourt.

Nevermind.

Snicker

Post: #14

EAS

Do we have a shot at him? I like Markel a lot and would also like to see him get developmental mins.

Post: #15

Post: #16

(04-29-2015 12:14 PM)mapdude Wrote: Wow, this gives a whole new meaning to the term "one and done".

Why is he leaving there...? He said he was staying. I wonder I do.
" Gibbs said in March he'd be returning to Seton Hall for his final season, but something has obviously shifted him off that vow."

Post: #17

(04-29-2015 08:25 AM)Atlanta Wrote: We don't need another guard. We need a stopper & rebounder in the middle if we are to get another player for next season.

We need a playmaker. Everyone needs a stopper.

Post: #18

(04-29-2015 12:22 PM)snowtiger Wrote:

(04-29-2015 12:14 PM)mapdude Wrote: Wow, this gives a whole new meaning to the term "one and done".

Why is he leaving there...? He said he was staying. I wonder I do.
" Gibbs said in March he'd be returning to Seton Hall for his final season, but something has obviously shifted him off that vow."

Must be a lousy incompetent coach.

Post: #19

Post: #20

(04-29-2015 12:56 PM)Tiger46 Wrote:

(04-29-2015 08:25 AM)Atlanta Wrote: We don't need another guard. We need a stopper & rebounder in the middle if we are to get another player for next season.

We need a playmaker. Everyone needs a stopper.

Absolutely. A stopper should be standard equipment on all humans.